Testing and the whole notion of individual difference is something that psychology has embraced, investigated and developed throughout its history.
Broadly speaking psychological testing can be defined as the use of one or more standardized measurement instruments, devices, or procedures including the use of computerized psychological tests, to observe or record human behaviour.
This is a useful definition insofar as it highlights the main purpose of psychological testing i. e. to observe or record human behaviour, but what it does not do is differentiate between the two main types of testing, namely projective testing and psychometric testing. Two very different types of testing that you need to be aware of.
The best-known projective psychological test is the Rorschach inkblot test and it dates back to 1921. It’s named after the Swiss psychiatrist Hermann Rorschach. Hermann Rorschach had a great interest in psychoanalysis and in 1918 he began experimenting with inkblots with his own patients. Encouraged by what he found, he published his findings in 1921.
Rorschach always cautioned that his findings were preliminary and stressed the importance of much more experimentation; sadly he could not do much of this himself as he died the following year in 1922. Initially Rorschach’s work received little attention but in time his inkblot test became a popular method of psychological evaluation.
During the assessment patients are shown a series of inkblots and are asked to to say the first thing that comes to mind. Because the stimulus is ambiguous, it is claimed that the patient must impose his or her own structure and in doing so they reveal their thoughts, feelings, and themes, some of which are unconscious and have been projected into the inkblot image. (hence the term projective testing)
The important thing to note about psychometric testing is that it’s governed by 3 key principles:
1. INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCE
To what extent does the individual being tested differ from other individuals in relation to the ability, trait or construct in question?
2. TEMPORAL DIFFERENCE
To what extent does the same individual differ in relation to the ability, trait or construct in question when measured on different occasions?
3. STATISTICAL ADHERENCE
In order to make an informed judgement about an individual you must have a normative frame of reference in place in order to analyse the test result.
Put simply you need a benchmark so that you can compare the test score you’re interested in with the scores obtained from a representative sample.
If you’re serious about pursuing a career as a psychologist, there is a very good chance that you will have learn about and become comfortable with the statistical procedures associated with psychometric testing.
This statement alone is enough to make most people consider an alternative career path but don’t be phased by the thought of statistics because the principles you need to come to terms (although extending beyond the confines of this discussion) are actually very straight forward. Honest!
If you'd like to find out more about psychological testing, you can do so by visiting http://www.all-about-forensic-psychology.com/psychological-testing.html
Having worked as a lecturer in psychology in the UK, I recently moved to sunny Spain with my family, where I now work as a distance learning tutor and research dissertation supervisor.
Since 2000, I've been involved in collaborative research with teams of forensic scientists in the UK, US and Canada.
To find out more about the fascinating world of forensic psychology Visit my website http://www.all-about-forensic-psychology.com/