Already on ArticleSlash?

Forgot your password? Sign Up

Heller Vs DC Supreme Court Decision The Reality

 


Visitors: 385

I, for one, was really happy about the Supreme Court's decision regarding “Heller vs DC". For once-the Anti-Gun crowd has taken a hit, in their claim that the 2nd Amendment wording “Right of The People", does not in fact mean “The People-Citizens-Just Me and You". The Supreme Court has determined otherwise. Not only was this a “Blackeye" for the Anti-Gun crowd, but also a reason of celebration for the Pro-Gun crowd, and indeed, a lot of us did celebrate! However-Let's look at this “Victory" very carefully!

The Justices determined that the wording, did indeed refer to the people, giving the people the “Right to keep and bear arms". A more in depth reading of the decision, clarifies the true judgment of the Justices.

1. “. . . violate the Second Amendment Right of individuals. . . "
THE COURT RULED TODAY THAT THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS AN INDIVIDUAL RIGHT, AND THE BAN VIOLATED IT.

2. “. . . who are not affiliated with any state-regulated militia. . . "
THE COURT RULED TODAY THAT MILITIA STATUS IS IMMATERIAL.

3. “. . . handguns and other firearms. . . "
THE COURT RULED TODAY THAT HANDGUNS ARE INCLUDED, THOUGH SOME ROOM WAS LEFT FOR VERY NARROW TYPES OF GUN BANS

4. “. . . for private use in their homes. "
THE RULING TODAY WAS LIMITED TO “IN THE HOME" AS THAT WAS ALL THAT WAS IN FRONT OF THE COURT

This is definitely a victory in our quest for the True wording of the Second Amendment-But the True Battle has just started. San Francisco and Chicago are the first targets of the NRA and Pro-Gun groups. The decision of the Supreme Court will be the focal point of these lawsuits, and you can be certain, that the lawyers for these cities will have one thing on their mind-The Supreme Court ruling Did Not eliminate the power of the States to pass “Reasonable" laws to protect their citizens. What is “Reasonable"? That makes a good question for a Second “Supreme Court Decision".

The fact is-There will be numerous “Reasonable" laws passed, ( Or shall we say Reasonable Infringements ), by numerous Cities and States, using the LOOPHOLE, that the Supreme Court Ruling has provided ( See Numbers-3 and 4 ). This is the upcoming battle, Not a challenge of the Justices decision-a Challenge of what the Justices Did Not Decide.

For more Up tp the Minute Information on your Second Amendment Right's- We The People

(405)

Article Source:


 
Rate this Article: 
 
African-Americans Could Never be Citizens According to a U.S. Supreme Court ..
Rated 4 / 5
based on 5 votes
ArticleSlash

Related Articles:

Summary of Bilski et al. v. Kappos Supreme Court Decision, June 28, 2010

by: Bruce Markey (July 01, 2010) 
(Legal/Patents)

Supreme Court Ruling on MAP

by: John Mehrmann (June 30, 2007) 
(Business)

Cyberbullying Gets Supreme Court Approval

by: Debba Boles (February 14, 2012) 
(Communications/Mobile Cell Phone)

The Activist Supreme Court Justice

by: Wayne Nolen (July 12, 2008) 
(News/Politics)

The Supreme Court's Plenary Power Doctrine

by: Joseph Devine (June 03, 2008) 
(Legal/Immigration)

Supreme Court Rules on Climate Change

by: Don Sutherland (April 04, 2007) 
(News)

Indiana Supreme Court Discusses Proceedings Supplemental

by: John Waller (July 01, 2007) 
(Real Estate)

Supreme Court of California Allows Cell Phone Search

by: Debba Boles (March 03, 2011) 
(Communications/Mobile Cell Phone)

Supreme Court Role Law Or Justice? - 1965 Editorial

by: Lindsey Williams (January 14, 2007) 
(Legal)

African-Americans Could Never be Citizens According to a U.S. Supreme Court ..

by: Neil Frankel (May 31, 2007) 
(Reference and Education)