Already on ArticleSlash?

Forgot your password? Sign Up

Indias Foreign Policy Predicament

 


Visitors: 287
 1 vote

Would being cozy with new found friends alienate trusted allies? A tough nut to crack. This is exactly the dilemma which the UPA government at the center faces today. As the PM and the Left remain adamant on their versions of the Indo - U. S. nuke deal this question assumes greater significance. One thing is clearly evident; the U. S. is awed by the double digit (one can say inflated numbers) growth figures, military might and influence of China in South - East Asia and wants to counter it by firing the bullet from India's shoulder as it recognizes Pakistan as a spent force in the region. In short, a zero sum game, an equation balancing its variables.

From our independence we have maintained and nurtured an independent foreign policy which does not undermine India's sovereignty. Many would argue that India had a leaning towards the Soviet Block till the 80's and the Indo - Russia - China axis is still relevant. However India as is widely known was a founding member nation of NAM and has always committed itself to resolving thorns through dialog rather than force. But we live in an imperfect world, where forging and strengthening relationships is an instrument of economic gains and political mileage.

Being ditched and being on the opposite side of the spectrum is not new for us. China did it to us in 1962 (we signed Panchseel agreement with them in 1958), incursions inside our territory in Arunachal is an ongoing affair. Pakistan is the habitual offender - 1948, 1965, 1971, 1999. . . . the proxy war is still on. IPKF suffered at the hands of both LTTE and Sri Lanka in 1989 - 1990 while Rajiv Gandhi lost his life fighting for peace in the abode of Ravana. At all these times India was fighting a lone battle against everyone. These tale of events made India realize that either you chose a father figure who doles out billions of dollars in exchange of sovereignty or tread along the path of economic growth which is riddled with challenges. We chose the latter, courtesy our visionary PM's 1991 budget, and now we command a dominant place in international politics (we are chucking a sizable amount of Uncle Sam's role), which is a reason for us being hounded.

As we enter into another 8 percent growth year, fulfilling the mounting energy needs of our population is an area of concern. With crude oil shooting up to $142 per barrel, and our coal not being of the highest quality compounds the problem. Nuclear power is a cheaper and a viable option. France meets almost 45% of its energy needs through Nuclear energy. This deal gives us the technology and fuel for our starving nuclear reactors along with IAEA safeguards thereby in a way circumventing the U. S. sanctions. It has the potential to propel India as a major player in international affairs (read U. N. Security Council membership) and develop us as a regional power in face of our hostile neighbors. We would have an umbrella to protect ourselves from heavy rain. The question is whether the deal typecasts India as a strategic partner of U. S. and do we compromise our freedom and liberty in garb of this deal. Would we be compelled to toe the U. S. line on Iraq and Iran with whom we have cordial relations? Wouldn't this deal revive the beleaguered U. S. nuclear industry and oil the U. S. economy?

The alternative which the Left advocates is to aggressively push the Iran - Pakistan - India gas pipeline and work towards similar deals with France and Russia, not with U. S. The gas pipeline is fraught with difficulties given the fluid state of Pakistan and the high price demanded by Iran. Deals with France and Russia are wedged because IAEA safeguards agreement has not been signed. The Left is not in a mood to let the government go to IAEA as it believes then the Indo - U. S.deal would be on auto - pilot mode. An eyeball to eyeball confrontation is definitely on cards at this moment. This Indian news was first reported by newsislife.

In an election year with sky rocketing inflation, global food shortage and a bear market this deal could well prove to be the Achilles heel for government's survival.

To have more of India news and daily national & international updates, take out a minute to visit http://www.newsislife.com

Mr. Sam George loves to write features, articles and updated news. He is a qualified reporter and runs his own india news site to increase awareness. To know more news from India and international updates visit NewsIsLife.

(788)

Article Source:


 
Rate this Article: 
 
Gas and Electricity Predicament 2
Rated 1.0 / 5
based on 1 vote
ArticleSlash

Related Articles:

Mr. President What About Foreign Policy?

by: Warren Cooley (February 07, 2007) 
(News)

Pelosi Talks to Syria - Foreign Policy

by: Paul Davis (April 05, 2007) 
(Arts and Entertainment)

War - A Rational 21st Century Foreign Policy Strategy?

by: William Mills (June 04, 2007) 
(News)

The Foreign Policy of the 2008 US Presidential Election Candidates

by: Hamed Mousavi (August 31, 2008) 
(News/Pure Opinion)

A Book Review - American Foreign Policy - Carter to Clinton

by: Marzieh Motahhari (December 04, 2007) 
(News/Politics)

Thinking Ahead to Election 2008: The Need for a Foreign Policy Heavyweight

by: Don Sutherland (January 25, 2007) 
(News)

Historic Democrat Foreign Policy Incompetency Part II - Presidents Carter, ..

by: Travis Hill (January 11, 2009) 
(News/Pure Opinion)

Can Indias Tigers Survive?

by: Omer Ashraf (June 17, 2008) 
(Reference and Education/Wildlife)

Gas and Electricity Predicament 1

by: Barry Loughran (August 27, 2008) 
(News/Energy)

Gas and Electricity Predicament 2

by: Barry Loughran (August 27, 2008) 
(News/Energy)