Getting It Right: Taxation and Economic Growth

 


Visitors: 530

The power to tax is the power to destroy. Even Pharaoh, 3000 years ago, was aware of this wise saying. Unfortunately, it seems to have been forgotten by some of the more influential modern economists. But, what is destroyed? What is destroyed are economic incentives for business formation and growth.

With Congress and the White House talking sporadically about a stimulus package to spur economic growth, it is important to distinguish what tax policies will work and what is sheer political puff and business as usual (increase spending) disguised as an economic stimulus package. With this in mind, you might say that this article is a short primer on understanding the growth aspects of tax policy.

Taxes, broadly speaking, can be categorized into two types of headings-taxes on capital and taxes on labor. Since this article will be dealing with taxes on income, capital taxation would be identified with the corporate income tax. Similarly, a tax on labor is equivalent to the personal income tax schedule. Now the sixty-four thousand-dollar question. Which one is more important in helping to stimulate economic and business growth?

As President Lincoln stated in one of early speeches as president, the tax on labor is of more importance than the tax on capital. Why? Economic growth is driven by net new business formation. Or, to put it another way-the economy is driven briskly when everyone wants to be a business owner. When entrepreneurs (risk takers) start an enterprise, their business income tax is initially reported on the personal income tax schedule. As the business grows, the owners may incorporate and file using the corporate tax rate. (As a reminder, when individuals start businesses, they hire people. Businesses with less than 100 employees are responsible for 75% of the net new job growth. Net new business formation should be the goal of tax policy designed to stimulate economic growth. )

Since the tax on labor is more important than the tax on capital, the top marginal income tax rate on labor should be less than the top corporate rate. Presently, the top corporate tax rate is 35%, while the top tax rate on labor is about 35%. If policy makers are serious about providing incentives for stimulating vibrant business growth, the top personal income tax rate should be reduced to less than 35%. To provide a real fillip to economic growth, the top personal income tax rate should be significantly below 35%. It was no accident that President Regan, in his second term, reduced the top individual rate to 28%. This was a true top rate that did not include any phaseout of deductions or any of that nonsense that has the perverse effect of increasing the marginal rate.

Economic policy makers, whether they are in an administrative or legislative position, like to take the path of least resistance-similar to electrons in a circuit. Their path of least resistance to stimulate economic growth is to increase spending. It doesn’t work! (If it did, many of the major European economies would be booming by now. Instead they have been in the doghouse for the past ten years. ) The money for their increased spending is just sucked-out of the private sector. The net effect is zero.

Providing financial incentives for individuals to take business risks by significant and immediate reductions in the top individual marginal income tax rate is the best way to promote sustained and vibrant economic growth.

Sanford Kahn, Business Author/Speaker, has been a professional speaker for over 30 years to both the corporate and national trade and professional association markets. He was the host and producer of the popular Times mirror cable vision series “Ask the Economist". Mr. Kahn has authored many articles on the business impact of future economic trends. His most recent publication is The Great Economic & Business Myths That Dominate Our Lives. For more information please visit his web page at http://www.businessspeaker.biz .

(663)

Article Source:


 
Rate this Article: 
 
The McCain Tax Reform Plan For Long Term Economic Growth?
Rated 4 / 5
based on 5 votes
ArticleSlash

Related Articles:

Why PR is an Engine for Economic Growth

by: Robert A. Kelly (January 28, 2005) 
(Business/Public Relations)

GST and Economic Growth

by: Sanjay Chauhan (September 23, 2011) 
(Finance/Taxes)

The Positive Economic Growth in India

by: Jajati Patro (November 25, 2010) 
(Business/International Business)

Lessons From Ireland on Economic Growth

by: Randy Bisenz (July 22, 2008) 
(News/Economics)

The Impact of India's Economic Growth on Tourism

by: Manoj Gursahani (March 14, 2007) 
(Travel and Leisure)

Healing America: Inducing Structured Economic Growth

by: Jim Ray (September 15, 2006) 
(Business)

Mortgages: Encouraging Stronger Personal Economic Growth

by: Aileene Woul (November 11, 2005) 
(Finance/Mortgage Refinance)

Domestic Airlines in India: A Great Impetus to the Economic Growth

by: Lisa Kelly (February 03, 2012) 
(Travel and Leisure/Airline Travel)

Inflation and Growth in Asia Pacific The Myth of Economic Decoupling

by: John Chng Kean Siang (July 22, 2008) 
(Business/International Business)

The McCain Tax Reform Plan For Long Term Economic Growth?

by: Steve Selengut (July 14, 2008) 
(Finance/Taxes)