Investing - Don't Shoot Yourself in the Foot with Emotional Errors


Visitors: 124

Classic economic theory posits that investors always behave perfectly rationally, in their own best interests. Emotions are not involved. You may be thinking, “That contradicts all my common observations and experiences in life, ” and you would be right. Nevertheless, classical economic theory is based on a world full of rational, informed, iron-willed, self-interested, consistent, and efficient actors.

Behavioral finance, on the other hand, recognizes the obvious: That investors are often influenced by emotion, and that therefore they make illogical, inconsistent, and ill-informed decisions, despite their best intentions to act in their own self-interest.

There have been many studies in behavioral finance since the field took off about 30 years ago. The studies—impressive in their variety—have attempted to find out how most people really act when making financial decisions.

It turns out that we humans have several tendencies that don’t help very much when we are investing. They skew our judgment. Here are the most common traits that lead to investor self-sabotage:

-Failing to realize that the loss of an “unbooked” gain is really a loss. Some investors think it is only a loss if the account falls below what they originally invested. They view an intermediate gain as not real, sort of like playing with house money.

-Failing to sell a hopeless investment, hoping that it will come back. This is called loss aversion—people do not want to admit having made a mistaken investment. The typical person feels more pain from a loss than joy at an equivalent gain. He or she wants to avoid regret over the loss—so they just don’t book it.

-Failing to take on enough risk, and thus investing too conservatively. Over many years, the most conservative investments (such as cash and bonds) do not keep up with inflation. Thus, ironically, what seems most conservative actually bears more risk: the loss of purchasing power to inflation as the years pass by.

-Not accepting a loss as the sunk cost it really is. This “sunk cost fallacy” keeps you focused on the past and diverts attention from what you can do now to get better results in the future.

-Selling winners too soon (to lock in profits, thus creating a feeling of victory), but holding losers too long (waiting for them to get back to even so that there is no loss to regret).

-Forgetting that the real goal of investing is to build wealth as effectively as possible, rather than to justify the decisions you’ve made that got you where you are right now. This can lead you to fail to evaluate your current investments on their potential to produce gains from this point forward, which at any given time is the most important issue.

-Becoming paralyzed by too many options. This inability to make “choice under conflict” leads to taking no action at all when action is called for.

-Resigned acceptance of the status quo.

-Ignoring long-run “background odds” in the face of more immediate or newsworthy information. For investors, the important background trend is that the stock market has returned an average of 10% to 11% since before the Great Depression. That’s more than twice as much as the bond market.

-"Preferential bias": The difficulty in changing an opinion about something once an opinion has been formed, even if the opinion is only subconscious. This causes incoming data to be processed selectively, with supportive information being favored and contradictory information downplayed or even ignored. The end result is reduced objectivity.

Obviously, an investor who is subject to any or all of the foregoing traits cannot be totally rational, even if he or she is trying to be.

The Sensible Stock Investor needs to be as rational as possible, because over time, the stock market tends to reward rational decisions. That is, the market tends to move stocks towards their intrinsic values. For example, if you paid too much for a stock, over time the market will reduce your returns from that stock or even turn them into actual losses as it brings the price of the stock back to what it is really worth. Regretting the loss, failing to accept the sunk cost, holding onto the loser too long, failing to look ahead rather then back, and/or resigned acceptance of the status quo obviously do not help you make the best decision in this situation.

Fortunately, we humans can counteract some of our psychological tendencies by using the left side of our brain to create smart tools and processes when we are making investment decisions. Such tools and processes would include:

  • A thorough system for evaluating whether a company is a good company

  • Calculating a well reasoned number as a fair price for its stock-a price that reflects the stock's potential for future gain through dividends, capital appreciation, or both

  • Resolving never to make snap judgments on fragments of information or hot tips

  • Writing out your investment goals

  • Taking into account your unique situation, including honestly assessing your appetite for risk and for volatility in your holdings

  • Choosing strategies that are likely to achieve your goals without making you uncomfortable-and then sticking to those strategies

  • Making, periodically updating, and using a “shopping list” of investments that meet your criteria

  • Systematically reviewing your holdings with an eye to the future

    In the end, you want to apply your intelligence and objectivity to overcome self-defeating emotional tendencies. Left-brain-based systems and processes such as those just outlined can help you to do that, and therefore to become a better investor.

    If you would like to learn about a systematic stock approach that provides tools and processes to help you overcome self-defeating emotional tendencies, please consider Sensible Stock Investing: How to Pick, Value, and Manage Stocks. The book has a perfect 5-star reader rating on Click on this link to go directly to the book's page on . Or click on this link to learn more about the book and its sytematic approach designed specifically for busy individual investors :

    I encourage you to reproduce this article or any portion of it. If you do so, please include the title, author, and the following Web site address: . Thank you.

  • (1135)

    Article Source:

    Rate this Article: 
    Don't Shoot The Beginner Piano Player
    Rated 4 / 5
    based on 5 votes

    Related Articles:

    Do Not Shoot Yourself in the Foot

    by: Jason Monastra (November 11, 2008) 
    (Business/Careers Employment)

    10 Ways Entrepreneurs Shoot Themselves In The Foot

    by: Catherine Franz (October 31, 2004) 

    Verbal Self Sabatoge - How Women Shoot Themselves in the Professional Foot

    by: Kirstin Carey (June 23, 2005) 
    (Womens Interests)

    Don't Shoot the Birds

    by: Hubert Crowell (December 31, 2006) 
    (Kids and Teens)

    Don't Shoot the Messenger

    by: Theresa Cahill (December 14, 2005) 
    (Internet and Businesses Online/Internet Marketing)

    Bob Hope: Don't Shoot, It's Only Me!

    by: John T Jones, Ph.D. (February 05, 2007) 
    (Arts and Entertainment)

    Don't Shoot Me, I'm Just The Math Teacher!

    by: Joe Pagano (August 23, 2007) 
    (Reference and Education)

    Don't Shoot The (Yahoo) Messenger!

    by: Jakob Jelling (February 22, 2005) 
    (Internet and Businesses Online)

    Don’t shoot the messenger (or in this case the Dongle)

    by: Mark Pin (August 04, 2010) 
    (Communications/Broadband Internet)

    Don't Shoot The Beginner Piano Player

    by: Rhiannon Schmitt (June 30, 2006) 
    (Arts and Entertainment/Music)