Loss Sharing in Theory and Practice

 


Visitors: 141

Over the past decade central banks and financial regulators have placed a heavy emphasis on ensuring that “National Payment Systems” are made as safe and secure as possible. We have seen the proliferation of Real Time Gross Settlement for high value payments and host of other arrangements for the “small ticket” systems. Generally these smaller systems settle on a multilateral net basis.

In the Bank for International Settlement’s “Core Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems” there is the requirement that “A system in which multilateral netting takes place should, at a minimum, be capable of ensuring the timely completion of daily settlements in the event of an inability to settle by the participant with the largest single settlement obligation”. Additionally there is the requirement that such systems should seek to exceed the minimum Core Principle requirements.

One way of structuring a “fail safe" arrangement is the use of Loss Sharing Arrangements.

A Loss-Sharing Agreement is defined by the Bank of International Settlements as an agreement between participants in a transfer (i. e. payment) system or clearing house arrangement regarding the allocation of any loss arising should one or more participants fail to fulfill their obligation/s. The arrangement stipulates how the loss will be shared among the parties concerned in the event that the agreement is activated.

The term itself is really a misnomer as depending on its structure, it is more of an arrangement to redistribute obligations rather than an apportionment of losses. It is often also referred to as an Additional Settlement Obligation.

The basic concept behind the arrangement is to apportion any shortfall in settlement obligations either on the basis that this is covered by the defaulting party (the Defaulter Pays Model) or by the surviving members of the clearing arrangement (the Survivors Pay Model).

The principles behind the models are fairly simple and are set out below.

Defaulter Pays Model

  • Each participant in the payment system or clearing arrangement puts up collateral to cover its debit (i. e. obligation) position if it fails to pay.

  • This can be for full or only partial settlement of the defaulter’s obligation. If it is only partial then an additional arrangement will be needed to cover the residual shortfall. This could be a “survivor’s pay” model or it could be covered by another party such as the central bank.

  • For this model to work effectively a limit or “cap” needs to be placed on the maximum net debit position of each participant in the payment system or clearing arrangement. In some systems, such as the cheque system setting this sort of limit is almost impossible to do.

    Survivors Pay Model

  • The survivors (i. e. the participants who are left) agree to cover the shortfall of the defaulter on some pre-agreed basis (formulae). This could be based on (1) equal shares (mutualisation), (2) proportionate shares as on the day before the default, (3) proportionate shares based on actual exposure over a period of time (such as a month, or a year) or (4) some other agreed basis.

    Stanley Epstein is a Principal Associate and Director of Citadel Advantage Ltd. , a specialist bank operations consultancy and training provider in the area of Operations Risk, Business Continuity and Payment Systems. Further information and details can be found at http://www.citadeladvantage.com

  • (594)

    Article Source:


     
    Rate this Article: 
     
    Rubber-Ball Theory of Career and Success/ Circle and Crowd Theory of Life and ..
    Rated 4 / 5
    based on 5 votes
    ArticleSlash

    Related Articles:

    Your Ideas Are Fine In Practice, But Will They Work In Theory?

    by: Dr. Gary S. Goodman (November 07, 2006) 
    (Business)

    Applying The Daffodil Theory into Business Practice

    by: Jennifer Schilling (January 19, 2005) 
    (Business/Entrepreneurialism)

    To-Do List For Success -- Time Management: Theory And Practice

    by: Yola Eve (May 25, 2006) 
    (Self Improvement/Time Management)

    Review - Ross, Andrew: "The Theory and Practice of International ..

    by: Kenneth Rice (September 28, 2006) 
    (Self Improvement)

    Before You Interview, Learn and Practice Ed's "Zip a Lip" Theory

    by: Ed Bagley (March 21, 2008) 
    (Business/Careers Employment)

    Learning to Drive - A Step-by-Step Guide to the Theory and Practice

    by: Jay Tillotson (November 12, 2008) 
    (Automotive)

    How to practice your driving theory test and practical test

    by: John Lee (January 24, 2012) 
    (Automotive/Motorcycles)

    Sharing Photos Online - What Should I Know About Sharing Pictures Over The Web?

    by: Mike Singh (December 06, 2006) 
    (Arts and Entertainment)

    Perfect Web Writing 101 - Practice Practice Practice

    by: Rob Mead (June 12, 2007) 
    (Internet and Businesses Online/Blogging)

    Rubber-Ball Theory of Career and Success/ Circle and Crowd Theory of Life and ..

    by: Sanjeev Himachali (September 27, 2005) 
    (Self Improvement/Coaching)